1-22-14 * added
1-23-14 scroll down for edit(**) comments
1-24-14
Pop Four?
Randi Rhodes: Defender and Explainer of Obamanomics?Norman Goldman: Radical Middle?
Ed Schultz: Ed Head of the People?
Mike Malloy: Contrary Brin
The Less Than Pentagonal File
No apologies (*) to Mike Malloy, nor insult to Contrary Brin*, but maybe the mechanics(or dimanics) of the parallel points. Akin to Newton’s orbit(**). i.e. 3-body problem. And even deeper Hegelian remarks to Terral, in regard to not getting there yet. i.e. accidental reference under Post-Doc Terral nature of the point. Parallels do not tangent.
Further ow[!]
parallels-meet-religion-and-nationalism-in-the-early when-the-parallels-meet-and-talk
where-parallels-meet.html
1-22-14
Time is a funny thing. The fourth dimension? What about perpendicular to the 3? But then there is the parallel of not having time to follow every tangent let alone parallels.
**1-23-14 links titled and morphed, lines 4 and 6 added. Link(or line)5 actually read or rubric's fit ?
No comments:
Post a Comment